The forecast, corrected to exactly where you are — not the region around you.
National weather agencies have run this exact play for decades: take every model available, weigh each by how well it verifies against real observations, and correct for what's left over. That process — data assimilation — has always lived behind billion-dollar infrastructure, built for regions, not for one specific rooftop, mast, or ridgeline. Datum runs the same grade-blend-correct logic against a single point of real ground truth, at whatever scale a sensor already there can reach.
Any real sensor already producing readings qualifies — a backyard station, a boat's wind instrument, a farm probe, a remote ridgeline unit. No new hardware, no new network.
AccuWeather, Meteoblue, and named models like GFS, ECMWF, and ICON are scored against that ground truth, at every lead time from tomorrow to a week out.
Models are combined by that track record and corrected for each one's own known bias at that exact point — a single number more accurate than any source alone.
One button, one conversation, spoken back in plain language. The same interface works whether the ground truth sits in a yard, on a mast, or on a ridge.
Every solution below runs the identical grade-blend-correct logic — the only thing that changes is what real sensor it's pointed at.
Each Datum solution is built to serve one customer's ground truth — but every station added quietly makes every other station's forecast a little smarter too. This is the exact parallel to what happened at Weather Underground: a consumer product whose real asset turned out to be the network itself, dense enough to see what the big government models couldn't — valuable enough that IBM's acquisition fed it directly into GRAF, IBM's own forecast model. Synoptic Data runs a version of the same business today, aggregating access to over 170,000 mesonet stations. Datum is positioned to build the same kind of asset on purpose, from day one.